Vermont -- It is true, as some have argued, that the need to free up the courts and police time from having to process small marijuana possession cases is not urgent. Therefore, that is no reason to alter the state penalties for possession of small amounts of the drug or possession of a small number of marijuana plants. However, that doesn't mean there are no good reasons for changing the law, which is now under consideration in the Vermont Legislature.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Vermont -- It is true, as some have argued, that the need to free up the courts and police time from having to process small marijuana possession cases is not urgent. Therefore, that is no reason to alter the state penalties for possession of small amounts of the drug or possession of a small number of marijuana plants. However, that doesn't mean there are no good reasons for changing the law, which is now under consideration in the Vermont Legislature.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Vermont -- It is true, as some have argued, that the need to free up the courts and police time from having to process small marijuana possession cases is not urgent. Therefore, that is no reason to alter the state penalties for possession of small amounts of the drug or possession of a small number of marijuana plants. However, that doesn't mean there are no good reasons for changing the law, which is now under consideration in the Vermont Legislature.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Vermont -- It is true, as some have argued, that the need to free up the courts and police time from having to process small marijuana possession cases is not urgent. Therefore, that is no reason to alter the state penalties for possession of small amounts of the drug or possession of a small number of marijuana plants. However, that doesn't mean there are no good reasons for changing the law, which is now under consideration in the Vermont Legislature.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Vermont -- It is true, as some have argued, that the need to free up the courts and police time from having to process small marijuana possession cases is not urgent. Therefore, that is no reason to alter the state penalties for possession of small amounts of the drug or possession of a small number of marijuana plants. However, that doesn't mean there are no good reasons for changing the law, which is now under consideration in the Vermont Legislature.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Vermont -- It is true, as some have argued, that the need to free up the courts and police time from having to process small marijuana possession cases is not urgent. Therefore, that is no reason to alter the state penalties for possession of small amounts of the drug or possession of a small number of marijuana plants. However, that doesn't mean there are no good reasons for changing the law, which is now under consideration in the Vermont Legislature.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Vermont -- It is true, as some have argued, that the need to free up the courts and police time from having to process small marijuana possession cases is not urgent. Therefore, that is no reason to alter the state penalties for possession of small amounts of the drug or possession of a small number of marijuana plants. However, that doesn't mean there are no good reasons for changing the law, which is now under consideration in the Vermont Legislature.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.